Packaging Design

Packaging Design

04 / Materials & Sustainability

04 / MATERIAL & SUSTAINABILITY

|

Key question

Which material protects well and has little impact on the environment?

The material determines protection, weight, costs, impact and disposal. Sustainable packaging provides good protection, uses as little material as necessary and can be recycled. You can find material details in the “Materials Science” course.

Learning objective: You can compare the key packaging materials, assess their recyclability, and make a reasoned choice of material for a product.

Less, but fitting.

4.1 / Material families

Every material has its strengths.

These material families are particularly important for packaging:

01

Cardboard & Corrugated Cardboard

Lightweight, easily printable and recyclable; requires a barrier for aroma and grease.

02

Glass

Dense, premium, and easily recyclable, but heavy and fragile.

03

Metal

Tinplate and aluminium protect against light and air and are easily recyclable.

04

Plastic

Lightweight and versatile; easier to recycle as a mono-material than as a composite.

No single material is always the best. Glass is great for recycling, but heavy to ship; a thin plastic bag saves weight, but is often difficult to recycle. What matters is the combination of the product, the journey, and disposal.

The best material depends on the product.

4.2 / Design for recyclability

The cycle begins with the design.

Packaging is recyclable if it can be collected, sorted and processed into new material. Mono-materials, meaning a single type of material, help with this; composite materials made of paper, plastic and aluminium can hardly be separated.

In Switzerland, collection schemes for glass, paper, cardboard, aluminium, tinplate, and PET drinks bottles are well established; for other plastics, facilities vary by region. Design in such a way that customers know which part goes where.

01

Mono-material

A single material instead of a composite that is difficult to separate.

02

Avoid excessive packaging

As much material as necessary, as little as possible.

03

Disposal instructions

Clearly shows customers how to separate and dispose of the parts.

Recyclable means separable and collectable.

4.3 / Justifying the choice of material

Select requirements, then compare.

A good choice of materials starts with the requirements profile: how delicate is the product, how far will it travel, where will it be sold, and what impression should it make? This creates a shortlist to discuss with suppliers and printers.

Life cycle assessments often reveal surprising results: a lightweight material can perform better than a heavier one, despite having a poorer recycling rate. Don't rely on your gut feeling – ask for the data instead.

Ask for data, not gut feeling.

Try it out
Material matrix

Select the requirements for your packaging. The tool compares eight material solutions based on protection, weight, recycling and impact, and provides a recommendation.

1 / Choose requirements · 4 chosen

Examples for «Alpenkraut»:

Recommendation · 100 % match

Glass with lid

Tight and refined, but heavy and fragile in shipping. Alternative: Tinplate can (85 %).

The recommendation is heavy. If it is also sold online, add «Light for shipping» and compare.

2 / Comparison of all solutions

1. Glass with lid

100 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Tight and refined, but heavy and fragile in shipping.

2. Tinplate can

85 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Protects fully and can be reused; more expensive in small runs.

3. Laminate bag paper/alu/plastic

65 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Very good protection, but hardly recyclable.

4. Folding box virgin fibre board

60 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Prints very well; for tea only with an inner bag as barrier.

5. Paper bag with barrier

60 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Good alternative to laminates; recycling depends on the barrier share.

6. Mono-material plastic bag

60 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Light and tight; collection in Switzerland varies by region.

7. Folding box recycled board

55 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Cheap and circular; for food, check the barrier against migration.

8. Corrugated board

50 %

Protection
Weight
Recycling
Impact

Ideal for shipping and inserts, not very refined on the shelf.

The values are simplified guide values from 1 to 5. Clarify barrier, food suitability and life-cycle assessment with the suppliers; material details are in the course «Materials».

Exercise

Compare material variants

Task: Compare three packaging material solutions for 'Alpenkraut' loose-leaf tea and justify your choice.

STEP 1

Specify five requirements, such as aroma protection and shipping.

STEP 2

Select three material solutions and compare them in the tool.

STEP 3

Research how each solution is disposed of in your local community.

STEP 4

Justify your choice over ‘Alpenkraut’ in three sentences.

Evaluation: Does your reasoning stand up to scrutiny?

© 2026 Corinna Kost, Basel